Richard Stephen Calkins and Michael Easton v. Mark W. Sullivan
Richard Stephen Calkins and Michael Easton v. Mark W. Sullivan
Opinion
Opinion issued August 29, 2024
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00528-CV ——————————— RICHARD STEPHEN CALKINS AND MICHAEL EASTON, Appellants V. MARK W. SULLIVAN, STEVE M. KING, G WESLEY URQUHART, G.
WESLEY URQUHART, P.C., AND MARY ELIZABETH URQUHART, Appellees and G WESLEY URQUHART, G. WESLEY URQUHART, P.C., AND MARY ELIZABETH URQUHART, Cross-Appellants V. RICHARD STEPHEN CALKINS AND MICHAEL EASTON, Cross- Appellees
On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-21236
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants/cross-appellees Richard Stephen Calkins and Michael Easton appeal from the trial court’s judgment signed on May 3, 2024. Calkins and Easton have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, arguing that the appeal is moot because the trial court granted their motion to modify and entered a new final judgment on August 15, 2024.
Appellees/cross-appellants, G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart, filed a notice of cross-appeal from the trial court’s May 3, 2024 judgment, stating in their notice of appeal that they were filing the notice of cross-appeal subject to the motion to modify filed by appellants/cross- appellees Calkins and Easton. Appellees and cross-appellants are unopposed to the motion to dismiss.
We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal and cross-appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Rivas-Molloy.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.