Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2024

William Jason Perez v. the State of Texas

William Jason Perez v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 30, 2024

William Jason Perez v. the State of Texas

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00105-CR

William Jason Perez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-23-0118-B, THE HONORABLE TRACIE WRIGHT-RENEAU, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Appellant William Jason Perez guilty of second-degree sexual assault and assessed punishment at ten-years’ imprisonment and assessed a $10,000 fine. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 12.33; 22.011(a)(1), (f). On the jury’s recommendation, the trial court suspended his sentence and placed him on community supervision for ten years. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42A.053. He appeals.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel along with a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and presents no arguably meritorious issues. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that he sent copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and provided a copy of the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744.

We have conducted an independent review of the record—including the record of the trial proceedings below and appellate counsel’s brief—and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and that the appeal is frivolous.

We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Affirmed Filed: August 30, 2024 Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.