Rose Creek Townhome Owner's Association, Inc. v. AJ Real Estate Investments, LLC and Rose Creek Townhomes, LLC
Rose Creek Townhome Owner's Association, Inc. v. AJ Real Estate Investments, LLC and Rose Creek Townhomes, LLC
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 27, 2024
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00556-CV ROSE CREEK TOWNHOME OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, ALKA SHRESTHA, RANDY BARTLETT, CHRISTINA BARTLETT, TENISHA JOHNSON, DEVONTE HARPER, WESLEY NUTE, DAIQUARI WILSON, LUKE JOHNSON, SARAH JOHNSON, MENAGERI VILLAVASSO, MATTHEW VILLAVASSO, SARAH AN, CHARLES AN, DEVIN EATON, JONATHAN SMITH, JAMES BAGBY, NAOKO BAGBY, MANUEL ORTIZ, ALICIA ORTIZ, KIMIKA BANFIELD, KATHLEEN QUINN, AND JUSTIN WEI, Appellants V. AJ REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC AND ROSE CREEK TOWNHOMES, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-24-03429 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Pedersen, III, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Before the Court is the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
/Bill Pedersen, III// 240556f.p05 BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT ROSE CREEK TOWNHOME On Appeal from the 160th Judicial OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, INC., District Court, Dallas County, Texas ALKA SHRESTHA, RANDY Trial Court Cause No. DC-24-03429.
BARTLETT, CHRISTINA Opinion delivered by Justice BARTLETT, TENISHA JOHNSON, Pedersen, III. Justices Partida- DEVONTE HARPER, WESLEY Kipness and Carlyle participating.
NUTE, DAIQUARI WILSON, LUKE JOHNSON, SARAH JOHNSON, MENAGERI VILLAVASSO, MATTHEW VILLAVASSO, SARAH AN, CHARLES AN, DEVIN EATON, JONATHAN SMITH, JAMES BAGBY, NAOKO BAGBY, MANUEL ORTIZ, ALICIA ORTIZ, KIMIKA BANFIELD, KATHLEEN QUINN, AND JUSTIN WEI, Appellants No. 05-24-00556-CV V. AJ REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC AND ROSE CREEK TOWNHOMES, LLC, Appellees In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal.
–2– Judgment entered this 27th day of August, 2024.
–3–
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.