Billy R. Young v. Artisha Henry
Billy R. Young v. Artisha Henry
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00566-CV
Billy R. Young, Appellant v. Artisha Henry, Appellee
FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 22DFAM331876, THE HONORABLE JACK WELDON JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Billy R. Young, acting pro se, seeks to appeal a ruling in his divorce proceeding. But the clerk’s record does not contain an appealable order or judgment, and without one, we may not exercise appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014 (authorizing appeals from certain interlocutory orders); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). On September 23, 2024, this Court requested that Young file a written response demonstrating our jurisdiction over his appeal. No response was filed.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: October 9, 2024
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.