Timothy Ennis Dba Upstage Developers and Katelyn Best Dba Upstage Developers v. Ashley Craig and Devin Craig
Timothy Ennis Dba Upstage Developers and Katelyn Best Dba Upstage Developers v. Ashley Craig and Devin Craig
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00178-CV __________________ TIMOTHY ENNIS DBA UPSTAGE DEVELOPERS AND KATELYN BEST DBA UPSTAGE DEVELOPERS, Appellants V. ASHLEY CRAIG AND DEVIN CRAIG, Appellees __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 22-12-17300-CV __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On April 4, 2024, Timothy Ennis dba Upstage Developers and Katelyn Best dba Upstage Developers filed a notice of appeal from a final judgment signed on April 29, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 27.1(a). But after perfecting their appeal Ennis and Best failed to file a brief.
On September 17, 2024, the Clerk of the Ninth Court of Appeals notified the parties that Ennis and Best had not filed a brief and advised the parties that this
appeal would be submitted without briefs unless by September 27, 2024, Ennis and Best submitted a brief and a motion to extend the deadline to file their brief. We warned Ennis and Best that if the Court submitted their appeal without briefs that the Court could dismiss their appeal for want of prosecution.
On October 7, 2024, the Clerk notified the parties that on October 28, 2024, the appeal would be submitted to the Court without briefs and without oral argument.
See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Because Ennis and Best have not filed a brief in their appeal assigning any error to any of the trial court’s rulings, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM Submitted on October 28, 2024 Opinion Delivered October 31, 2024 Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.