Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2024

In Re NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC, NTE Mobility Partners LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 Holding LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Holding LLC, Cintra NTE LLC, Cintra NTE Mobility Partners Segment 3 LLC, FedEx Express Corp. F/K/A FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Cintra US Services LLC v. the State of Texas

In Re NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC, NTE Mobility Partners LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 Holding LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Holding LLC, Cintra NTE LLC, Cintra NTE Mobility Partners Segment 3 LLC, FedEx Express Corp. F/K/A FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Cintra US Services LLC v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 1, 2024

In Re NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 LLC, NTE Mobility Partners LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Segments 3 Holding LLC, NTE Mobility Partners Holding LLC, Cintra NTE LLC, Cintra NTE Mobility Partners Segment 3 LLC, FedEx Express Corp. F/K/A FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Cintra US Services LLC v. the State of Texas

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00460-CV ___________________________ IN RE NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS SEGMENTS 3 LLC, NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS LLC, NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS SEGMENTS 3 HOLDING LLC, NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS HOLDING LLC, CINTRA NTE LLC, CINTRA NTE MOBILITY PARTNERS SEGMENT 3 LLC, FEDEX EXPRESS CORPORATION F/K/A FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., CINTRA US SERVICES LLC, CINTRA HOLDING US CORP. D/B/A CINTRA US CORP., FERROVIAL HOLDING US CORP., CINTRA TEXAS CORP., CINTRA TOLL SERVICES, LLC, ENERGY TRUCKING, LLC, NOLAN TRANSPORTATION GROUP, LLC, SIMON EXPRESS LLC, AND ENVIROTECH SERVICES, INC., Relators

Original Proceeding 153rd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 153-000000-22 Before Kerr, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Womack, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION The court has considered the relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, the response of the real parties in interest, and the relators’ reply and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam Delivered: November 1, 2024

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.