In Re Frost Bank v. the State of Texas
In Re Frost Bank v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 6, 2024 No. 04-24-00491-CV IN RE FROST BANK, Relator Original Proceeding 1 ORDER On July 22, 2024, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus asserting the trial court erred when it denied Relator’s Rule 91a motion to dismiss.
After considering the mandamus petition and record and Real Party in Interest’s response, we conclude the denial of the motion was an abuse of discretion.
Therefore, we conditionally GRANT mandamus relief, and DIRECT the trial court to vacate its order denying Relator’s Rule 91a motion, and enter an order granting Relator’s Rule 91a motion. This writ of mandamus will issue only if the trial court fails to comply within fifteen days of the date of our opinion and order.
It is so ORDERED on November 6, 2024.
_____________________________ Lori Massey Brissette, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of November, 2024.
_____________________________ Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023-CI-02298, styled UBA Pharmacy, LLC v. PNL Invest, LLC and Frost Bank, pending in the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa presiding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.