Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2024

In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas

In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 14, 2024

In Re: Charles J. Jayroe v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Denied and Opinion Filed November 14, 2024

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-01306-CV IN RE CHARLES J. JAYROE, Relator Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-55128-2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Smith Relator, who is proceeding pro se, filed a November 8, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to compel the trial court to promptly review all pending motions, conduct an expedited hearing on a motion for contempt, dismiss or strike an Order of Enforcement by Contempt and Suspension of Sentence against relator, ensure that all motions and requests are promptly presented to the judge for immediate review, expand the scope of relator’s counsel’s representation, and modify relator’s visitation with his child.

Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(g), (h), (j), (k)(1)(A); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a).

Because relator’s petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief, we deny the petition.

Additionally, relator’s separately filed record discloses unredacted sensitive data, including a minor’s full name, birthdate, and address, in violation of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9. Accordingly, we strike relator’s separately filed record.

241306f.p05 /Craig Smith// CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE

–2–

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.