Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth), 2024

In the Interest of O.M., J.M., and D.M., Children v. the State of Texas

In the Interest of O.M., J.M., and D.M., Children v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · Decided December 12, 2024
In the Interest of O.M., J.M., and D.M., Children v. the State of Texas

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00304-CV ___________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF O.M., J.M., AND D.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 233rd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 233-516858-12

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr MEMORANDUM OPINION On September 26, 2024, we received from pro se Appellant Father a document that we construed as an appellant’s brief. The next day, we notified Appellant that his brief did not conform with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i), 9.8, and 38.1(a)–(k) and with Second Court of Appeals Local Rules 1.A and 7. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i), 9.8, 38.1(a)–(k); 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1.A, 7. We directed Appellant to file an amended brief complying with those rules no later than October 7, 2024. See Tex. R. App. P. 9, 38; 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1. We also warned him that if he did not do so, we could strike his noncompliant brief and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 42.3. We have received no response.

Because Appellant has failed to file a rule-compliant amended brief after we afforded him an opportunity to do so, we strike his brief and dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 38.9(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr Elizabeth Kerr Justice Delivered: December 12, 2024

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.