James E. White, IV, Individually and as Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust; Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust; And Clinton Wesley White, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust, by and Through His Next Friend, James E. White, IV and James White, III, Individually and as Trustee of the Jane White Trust v. Edward McMinn White, Individually and as Trustee of the Edward McMinn White Trust, and Beauregard Brite White, Individually and as Trustee of the Beauregard Brite White Trust and Susan Combs, Temporary Interim Trustee of the White Division Trusts
James E. White, IV, Individually and as Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust; Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust; And Clinton Wesley White, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust, by and Through His Next Friend, James E. White, IV and James White, III, Individually and as Trustee of the Jane White Trust v. Edward McMinn White, Individually and as Trustee of the Edward McMinn White Trust, and Beauregard Brite White, Individually and as Trustee of the Beauregard Brite White Trust and Susan Combs, Temporary Interim Trustee of the White Division Trusts
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JAMES E. WHITE, IV, Individually and as § Beneficiary of the JANE WHITE TRUST; MARTI WHITE WRIGHT, Individually and § as a Beneficiary of the JANE WHITE TRUST; and CLINTON WESLEY WHITE, § Individually and as a Beneficiary of the JANE WHITE TRUST, by and through his § No. 08-23-00244-CV Next Friend, JAMES E. WHITE, IV and JAMES WHITE, III, Individually and as § Appeal from the TRUSTEE of the JANE WHITE TRUST, § 394th Judicial District Court Appellants, v. § of Presidio County, Texas EDWARD McMINN WHITE, Individually § (TC# 7856A) and as Trustee of the EDWARD McMINN WHITE TRUST, and BEAUREGARD § BRITE WHITE, Individually and as Trustee of the BEAUREGARD BRITE WHITE § TRUST and SUSAN COMBS, Temporary Interim Trustee of the WHITE DIVISION § TRUSTS.
§ Appellees.
JUDGMENT The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We further order that Appellants pay all costs of this appeal and that this decision be certified below for observance.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2024.
LISA J. SOTO, Justice Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.