In Re Justin Carl Pfeiffer v. the State of Texas
In Re Justin Carl Pfeiffer v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Opinion issued March 6, 2024
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00179-CV ——————————— IN RE JUSTIN CARL PFEIFFER, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator Justin Carl Pfeiffer filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting we order “the trial court to rule on Relator’s plea prior to proceeding with any merits- based issues respecting the counterclaims and motion for sanctions,” filed by Real Parties in Interest David H. Berg and David H. Berg & Associates PC, doing business as Berg & Androphy.1
The underlying case is Justin Carl Pfeiffer v. David H. Berg and David H. Berg & Associates PC, doing business as Berg & Androphy, Cause No. 2022-60439, We deny the petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Countiss, and Rivas-Molloy.
pending in the 269th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Cory Sepolio presiding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.