In the Interest of M.S., a Child v. the State of Texas
In the Interest of M.S., a Child v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00428-CV ___________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF M.S., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 367th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 22-6164-367
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On February 26, 2024, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal.
Per Curiam Delivered: March 21, 2024
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.