Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00013-CR Jeffrey Wayne NEWMAN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 658978 Honorable Rosie S. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 10, 2024 AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED In 2021, Appellant Jeffrey Wayne Newman was charged with assault causing bodily injury—married. A jury found him guilty. The trial court assessed punishment at one year in jail, ordered $365 in court costs, but granted Newman’s application for probation. Newman appealed his conviction. Court-appointed counsel filed an Anders brief, and the State filed a brief waiver.

Newman did not file a pro se brief. Having reviewed the record and counsel’s Anders brief, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

04-23-00013-CR

COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL’S ANDERS BRIEF Newman’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); counsel also filed a motion to withdraw. The brief recited the relevant facts with citations to the record. It presented a thorough review of the appellate record and a careful analysis of potential appellate issues. Counsel concluded “that this appeal is without any reasonably arguable merit.” See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.).

Appellate counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel provided Newman with a copy of the brief and counsel’s motion to withdraw, and he informed Newman of his right to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 85–86; see also Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Counsel also provided Newman with a draft pro se motion to request a free copy of the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319– (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

CONCLUSION Having reviewed the record and the Anders brief, we conclude that there are no arguable grounds for appeal and the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We affirm the trial court’s judgment, and we grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 85–86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

FURTHER REVIEW No substitute counsel will be appointed. Through a retained attorney or by representing himself, Newman may ask the Court of Criminal Appeals to review his case by filing a petition

-2- 04-23-00013-CR

for discretionary review. The petition must be filed with the clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days from the date of either (1) this opinion or (2) the last timely motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2, 68.3(a).

The petition must also comply with Rule 68.4. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Do not publish

-3-