Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2024

Michael Donald Lee Sanders v. Artemis Investment Holdings, LLC, Darin J. Ray and Duckworth & Ray, LLP

Michael Donald Lee Sanders v. Artemis Investment Holdings, LLC, Darin J. Ray and Duckworth & Ray, LLP
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 27, 2024

Michael Donald Lee Sanders v. Artemis Investment Holdings, LLC, Darin J. Ray and Duckworth & Ray, LLP

Opinion

Opinion issued June 27, 2024

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00059-CV ——————————— MICHAEL DONALD LEE SANDERS, Appellant V. ARTEMIS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, DARIN J. RAY, AND DUCKWORTH & RAY, LLP, Appellees

On Appeal from 12th District Court Grimes County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 035864

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Michael Donald Lee Sanders failed to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8(a).1 On April 2, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that

On January 29, 2024, Appellant had filed a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, representing that “the parties have entered into a settlement agreement that his appellate brief was past due, and his appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We directed Appellant to file his brief and a motion requesting an extension to file the brief within 10 days of our notice.

Appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We deny any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

dismisse[d] all claims with prejudice to the rights of either party.” We denied the Motion to Dismiss without prejudice on procedural grounds.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.