Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2024

Donald McCray v. the State of Texas

Donald McCray v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 27, 2024

Donald McCray v. the State of Texas

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00179-CR ___________________________ DONALD MCCRAY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 78th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. DC78-CR2023-1534

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Donald McCray has filed two pro se notices of appeal,1 but there is no record of a final judgment or an appealable order.

Because a final judgment or an appealable order is necessary for this court to obtain jurisdiction, see Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Ahmad, 158 S.W.3d at 526; McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (per curiam), we notified Appellant of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction. We warned that we would dismiss the appeal unless, within ten days, Appellant or any other party showed grounds for continuing it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Appellant responded with a brief that lodged various complaints about his case, but he did not identify a final judgment or appealable order giving us jurisdiction to consider his complaints.

Appellant’s notices of appeal reference the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment. The denial of a motion to dismiss or quash an indictment is not subject to interlocutory appeal. See Alonzo v. State, No. 03-23-00255-CR, 2023 WL 3907034, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 9, 2023, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal from denial of motion to set aside indictment for want of jurisdiction); Jones v. State, No. 02-18-00353-CR, 2018 WL 4177450, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 30, 2018, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (similar); Ahmad v. State, 158 S.W.3d 525, 526–27 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, pet. ref’d) (similar).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); see Ahmad, 158 S.W.3d at 526–27.

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth Bonnie Sudderth Chief Justice Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: June 27, 2024

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.