Charles Foster and Ryan Sankar v. Ryan Izzo and Talia Cappuccio, Individually
Charles Foster and Ryan Sankar v. Ryan Izzo and Talia Cappuccio, Individually
Opinion
Opinion issued February 4, 2025
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00660-CV ——————————— CHARLES FOSTER AND RYAN SANKAR, Appellants V. RYAN IZZO AND TALIA CAPPUCCIO, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees
On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2021-78901
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants Charles Foster and Ryan Sankar have not paid for the clerk’s record or the required filing fee and have not established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1 (indigence), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158. Notice concerning the past due filing fee issued on September 25, 2024 and notice concerning the failure to pay for the clerk’s record issued on November 4, 2024.
Both notices advised appellants that the appeal was subject to dismissal and requested a response. Appellants did not respond to either notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.