In Re Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as Sole Heirs and Personal Representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. the State of Texas
In Re Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as Sole Heirs and Personal Representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00130-CV IN RE Jerry RUMFIELD and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as sole heirs and personal representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 5, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On February 25, 2025, relators filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for stay.
After considering the mandamus petition and record, this court concludes relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relators’ emergency motion for stay is DENIED AS MOOT.
PER CURIAM
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 21-07-0572-CVA, styled Jerry Rumfield and Diana Rumfield, Individually and as sole heirs and personal representatives to the Estate of Brad Rumfield v. Jimmy G. Garza, pending in the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas, the Honorable Jennifer M. Dillingham presiding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.