Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. National Wildlife Federation
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. National Wildlife Federation
Opinion
ACCEPTED 15-24-00050-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/21/2025 5:15 PM No. 15-24-00050-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK In the Fifteenth District Court of AppealsFILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS Austin, Texas AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Clerk and GUADALUPE-BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellants, v. NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 98th District Court of Travis County, Texas Cause No. D-1-GN-20-007096 APPELLANT TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY’S ORAL ARGUMENT EXHIBIT
KEN PAXTON KELLIE E. BILLINGS-RAY Attorney General of Texas Chief, Environmental Protection Division BRENT WEBSTER First Assistant Attorney General KATIE B. HOBSON Assistant Attorney General RALPH MOLINA State Bar No. 24082680 Deputy First Assistant Attorney [email protected] General Office of the Attorney General AUSTIN KINGHORN Environmental Protection Division Deputy Attorney General for Civil P. O. Box 12548, MC-066 Litigation Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 463-2012 | Fax:(512) 320-0911 COUNSEL FOR THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY TCEQ ORAL ARGUMENT EXHIBIT Exhibit 1 Texas Water Code Chapter 11 – Statutory Excerpts
Respectfully submitted, KEN PAXTON Attorney General of Texas BRENT WEBSTER First Assistant Attorney General RALPH MOLINA First Assistant Attorney General AUSTIN KINGHORN Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation KELLIE E. BILLINGS-RAY Chief, Environmental Protection Division /s/ Katie B. Hobson KATIE B. HOBSON Assistant Attorney General State Bar No. 24082680 [email protected] OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Environmental Protection Division P. O. Box 12548, MC-066 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Tel: (512) 475-4019 | Fax: (512) 320-0911 ATTORNEYS FOR THE TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 21, 2025, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon the following counsel electronically through an electronic filing manager or by email: Marisa Perales [email protected] PERALES, ALLMON & ICE, P.C.
1206 San Antonio Street Austin, Texas 78701 Attorney for National Wildlife Federation Samia Broadaway [email protected] John Ormiston [email protected] Molly Cagle [email protected] BAKER BOTTS, L.L.P. S. First Street, Suite 1300 Austin, Texas 78704-1296 Attorneys for Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority
/s/ Katie B. Hobson KATIE B. HOBSON
EXHIBIT 1 Texas Water Code Chapter 11 - Statutory Excerpts Required Consideration of Environmental Flow Standards Tex. Water Code § 11.147(e-3). Notwithstanding Subsections (b)-(e), for the purpose of determining the environmental flow conditions necessary to maintain freshwater inflows to an affected bay and estuary system, existing instream uses and water quality of a stream or river, or fish and aquatic wildlife habitats, the commission shall apply any applicable environmental flow standard, including any environmental flow set-aside, adopted under Section 11.1471 instead of considering the factors specified by those subsections.
Tex. Water Code § 11.147(e). The commission shall include in the permit, to the extent practicable when considering all public interests, those conditions considered by the commission necessary to maintain fish and wildlife habitats. In determining what conditions to include in the permit under this subsection, the commission shall consider any assessment performed under Section 11.152.
Tex. Water Code § 11.152. ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS OF PERMITS ON FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITATS. In its consideration of an application for a permit to store, take, or divert water in excess of 5,000 acre feet per year, the commission shall assess the effects, if any, on the issuance of the permit on fish and wildlife habitats and may require the applicant to take reasonable actions to mitigate adverse impacts on such habitat. In determining whether to require an applicant to mitigate adverse impacts on a habitat, the commission may consider any net benefit to the habitat produced by the project. The commission shall offset against any mitigation required by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Parts 320-330 any mitigation authorized by this section.
TCEQ and GBRA v. NWF, 15-24-00050-CV TCEQ Oral Argument Exhibit 1 of 1, p. 1 of 2 The Legislature’s Stated Policy for Chapter 11 Sec. 11.0235. POLICY REGARDING WATERS OF THE STATE. (a) The waters of the state are held in trust for the public, and the right to use state water may be appropriated only as expressly authorized by law. (b) Maintaining the biological soundness of the state's rivers, lakes, bays, and estuaries is of great importance to the public's economic health and general well-being. The legislature encourages voluntary water and land stewardship to benefit the water in the state, as defined by Section 26.001. (c) The legislature has expressly required the commission while balancing all other public interests to consider and, to the extent practicable, provide for the freshwater inflows and instream flows necessary to maintain the viability of the state's streams, rivers, and bay and estuary systems in the commission's regular granting of permits for the use of state waters. As an essential part of the state's environmental flows policy, all permit conditions relating to freshwater inflows to affected bays and estuaries and instream flow needs must be subject to temporary suspension if necessary for water to be applied to essential beneficial uses during emergencies. (d) The legislature has not expressly authorized granting water rights exclusively for: (1) instream flows dedicated to environmental needs or inflows to the state's bay and estuary systems; or (2) other similar beneficial uses.
TCEQ and GBRA v. NWF, 15-24-00050-CV TCEQ Oral Argument Exhibit 1 of 1, p. 2 of 2 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Laura Courtney on behalf of Katie Hobson Bar No. 24082680 [email protected] Envelope ID: 98761627 Filing Code Description: Exhibit Filing Description: TCEQ's Oral Argument Exhibit Status as of 3/24/2025 7:01 AM CST Associated Case Party: Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Macey ReasonerStokes [email protected] 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM SENT Molly Cagle 3591800 [email protected] 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM SENT Samia Broadaway 24088322 [email protected] 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM SENT John Ormiston 24121040 [email protected] 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM SENT
Associated Case Party: National Wildlife Federation Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Marisa Perales 24002750 [email protected] 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM SENT
Associated Case Party: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Katie B.Hobson [email protected] 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM SENT
Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Laura Courtney [email protected] 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM SENT Mahita Shankar [email protected] 3/21/2025 5:15:34 PM SENT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.