Opinion issued April 8, 2025

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00068-CV ——————————— SIGNAD, LTD., Appellant V. STAN APOSTOLO A/K/A STANELY W. APOSTOLO AND APOSTOLO & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 12th District Court Grimes County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 035586

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, SignAd, Ltd., filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s November 14, 2024 order. On March 25, 2025, appellant filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” In its motion, appellant stated that “[i]n examining the record, SignAd determined [that] the [trial court’s] Summary Judgment did not resolve all issues because there [was] a [c]ounterclaim still pending.” Accordingly, there is no “final and appealable” order or judgment in the case. Appellant therefore requested that the Court dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a) (permitting voluntary dismissal of appeal on motion of appellant).

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of conference stating whether appellees, Stan Apostolo, also known as Stanley W.

Apostolo, and Apostolo & Associates, Inc., are opposed to the relief requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days has passed, and appellees have not responded to appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Gunn and Guiney.