Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2025

In Re Andrew J. Sanders v. the State of Texas

In Re Andrew J. Sanders v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 30, 2025

In Re Andrew J. Sanders v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00257-CR IN RE Andrew Jonathan SANDERS Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 30, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED On April 22, 2025, Relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus complaining of actions taken in San Antonio Municipal Court No. 5.

This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code, which expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a judge of a district court, statutory county court, statutory probate county court, county court, a court of inquiry, and certain associate judges in suits affecting the parent child relationship; and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeal’s jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221. This court has no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a municipal court judge unless it is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Chang, 176 S.W.3d 451, 452

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. S187375302, styled State of Texas v. Andrew Jonathan Sanders, pending in Municipal Court 5, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Melanie A. Castillo presiding.

04-25-00257-CR

(Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, orig. proceeding). Relator does not argue that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce this court's jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.