Arthur Rakowitz v. Wayne Pittman and Barbara Pittman
Arthur Rakowitz v. Wayne Pittman and Barbara Pittman
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00135-CV Arthur RAKOWITZ, Appellant v. Wayne PITTMAN and Barbara Pittman, Appellees From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CI01622 Honorable Nicole Garza, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 30, 2025 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION The clerk’s record was originally due on January 27, 2025, but it was not filed. On March 6, 2025, the trial court clerk notified this court that the clerk’s record was not filed when it was originally due because the appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee, and the appellant had failed to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. On March 18, 2025, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing by March 28, 2025, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not respond. Accordingly, the appeal is 04-25-00135-CV
dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.
PER CURIAM
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.