Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio), 2025

Ex Parte Israel Reyes v. the State of Texas

Ex Parte Israel Reyes v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · Decided May 21, 2025
Ex Parte Israel Reyes v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00304-CR EX PARTE Israel REYES Original Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Adrian A. Spears II, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 21, 2025 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On May 13, 2025, relator, Israel Reyes, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus.

We dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction.

Intermediate courts of appeal do not have original habeas jurisdiction in criminal law matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (original habeas jurisdiction of the courts of appeals is limited to cases in which a person’s liberty is restrained because they violated an order, judgment, or decree entered in a civil case); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (granting exclusive jurisdiction to consider original petitions for writs of habeas corpus to the court of criminal appeals, the district courts, county courts, and judges sitting on such courts).

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023CR6024, styled State of Texas vs Israel Reyes, pending in the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Joel Perez presiding.

04-25-00304-CR

The Court’s jurisdiction to consider habeas petitions in criminal matters is appellate only. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d). As such, we lack jurisdiction in this matter. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d); In re Neal, 653 S.W.3d 346, 346 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2022, orig. proceeding); In re Spriggs, 528 S.W.3d 234, 236 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2017, orig. proceeding).

The Court, having considered the petition, the record, and applicable law, concludes that we lack jurisdiction to issue the requested relief. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d); In re Neal, 653 S.W.3d at 346; In re Spriggs, 528 S.W.3d at 236. Accordingly, we dismiss this original proceeding for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.