Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00397-CV IN RE CONNOR GROUP Original Proceeding 1 0F

PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 2, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF, and MOTION FOR WRIT OF INJUNCTION DENIED On June 20, 2025, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, motion for temporary relief, and motion for writ of injunction complaining about eviction proceedings in the Bexar County Justice Court, Precinct 3, Place 1. Relator did not comply with Texas Rules of Procedure 52.3(k)(B) and 52.7(a) by failing to attach a certified copy of any pertinent motions or orders complained of. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(B) and 52.7(a). Generally, county courts at law have appellate jurisdiction over eviction actions. Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 24.004; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 27.031; see also Miller v. Miller, No. 05-21-00422-CV, 2022 WL 1260183, at *2 (Tex. App.—

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 31E2502359, styled The Connor Group as Agent for the Connor Group vs. Bradley, Shamar, and All Other Occupants, pending in the Municipal Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Julie Bray Patterson presiding.

04-25-00397-CV

Dallas Apr. 28, 2022, no pet.) (“County courts at law have appellate jurisdiction over eviction actions, but their appellate jurisdiction is confined to the jurisdictional limits of the justice court.”).

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Because relator failed to submit an adequate record, we are unable to conduct a meaningful review of her claims and our jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus, motion for temporary relief, and motion for writ of injunction are DENIED.

PER CURIAM

-2-