Leah Michal Rauhut v. the City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services
Leah Michal Rauhut v. the City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00145-CV
Leah Michal Rauhut, Appellant v. The City of Killeen and Killeen Animal Services, Appellees
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 24CCV01470, THE HONORABLE PAUL A. MOTZ, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The parties have filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss the Appeal Pursuant to Rule 42.1(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,” in which they request this Court to set aside the trial court’s judgment dismissing the case and remand the case for adjudication on the merits.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). While styled as a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, the relief the parties request in the substance of their motion is that we render judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement that the trial court’s judgment be reversed and the case be remanded for further proceedings. See id. (providing that Court may render judgment effectuating parties’ agreement). We cannot both dismiss an appeal and reverse and remand the case. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2; Lantana Ridge Prop. Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. SJWTX, Inc., No. 03-19-00303-CV, 2021 WL 904865, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 10, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.).
We deny the motion to the extent that it requests dismissal of the appeal but grant the remainder of the motion. We accordingly reverse the trial court’s judgment of dismissal and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings on the merits. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(d).
__________________________________________ Karin Crump, Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis Reversed and Remanded Filed: July 31, 2025
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.