Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland), 2025

William Lee Jackson, Jr. v. Clayton Bryan Stauffer and Black Label Services, Incorporated

William Lee Jackson, Jr. v. Clayton Bryan Stauffer and Black Label Services, Incorporated
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · Decided August 7, 2025
William Lee Jackson, Jr. v. Clayton Bryan Stauffer and Black Label Services, Incorporated

Opinion

Opinion filed August 7, 2025

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-25-00174-CV __________ WILLIAM LEE JACKSON, JR., Appellant V. CLAYTON BRYAN STAUFFER AND BLACK LABEL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Appellees

On Appeal from the 161st District Court Ector County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. B-23-05-466-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION On June 30, 2025, Appellant filed in this court a motion to extend time to file his petition for permissive appeal of the trial court’s order granting Appellee Black Label Services, Incorporated’s motion for partial summary judgment. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3(d); see TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d), (f) (West Supp. 2024). In the motion, Appellant requested an extension to secure a modified order that complied with Section 51.014(d) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See CIV. PRAC. & REM. § 51.014(d). Appellant filed his petition for permissive appeal on July 11, 2025, which he now seeks to withdraw. In his unopposed motion, Appellant states that he wishes to withdraw his petition given the impending trial date and “in light of considerations of judicial economy.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

We grant Appellant’s motion and dismiss his petition for permissive appeal.

We dismiss his motion to extend time to file his petition as moot.

W. STACY TROTTER JUSTICE

August 7, 2025 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.