Ex Parte Robert Joseph Yezak v. the State of Texas
Ex Parte Robert Joseph Yezak v. the State of Texas
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2025
NO. 03-25-00540-CR
Ex parte Robert Joseph Yezak
APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES CRUMP AND ELLIS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS
This is an attempted appeal from a purported order denying the pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2025
NO. 03-25-00541-CR
Ex parte Robert Joseph Yezak
APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES CRUMP AND ELLIS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS
This is an appeal from the order denying the motion to recuse or disqualify the trial court judge entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 6, 2025
NO. 03-25-00551-CR
Ex parte Robert Joseph Yezak
APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES CRUMP AND ELLIS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ELLIS
This is an attempted appeal from a purported order denying the pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.