Webber, LLC v. Marcos Saenz, Individually and as Next of Friend of S.S. and M.S.S., Minor Children

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00380-CV WEBBER, LLC, Appellant v. Marcos SAENZ, Individually and as Next of Friend of S.S. and M.S.S., Minor Children, Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2020CV05025 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 6, 2025 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Appellant filed an interlocutory notice of appeal challenging an order signed twenty-six days prior. The notice was thus untimely but within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by the rules. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b), 26.3. We ordered appellant to file a reasonable explanation for the late filing. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (courts imply a motion for extension of time when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period); see also Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886 (Tex. 2003) (noting that 04-25-00380-CV

“a reasonable explanation is ‘any plausible statement of circumstances indicating that failure to file within the [specified] period was not deliberate or intentional, but was the result of inadvertence, mistake or mischance’”). Appellant has not responded to our order in any manner.

We cannot imply a motion for extension of time in the absence of a reasonable explanation.

TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c).

PER CURIAM

-2-