Josephine Boyd v. Duc M Ta
Josephine Boyd v. Duc M Ta
Opinion
Opinion issued August 28, 2025
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00490-CV ——————————— JOSEPHINE BOYD, Appellant V. DUC M TA, Appellee
On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2024-39571
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Josephine Boyd appeals from a judgment signed June 1, 2025. Appellant has neither paid the required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July 26, 2024). Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice of July 23, 2025, advising appellant that if the fee was not paid, this appeal was subject to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.