Opinion issued August 26, 2025

In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00320-CV ——————————— SHARON BAYUS, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF INNOVATIVE ALTERNATIVES, INC., Appellant V. DENNIS STETZEL, AMBER CYR, STACY DICKSON, SEAN ARMISTEAD, AND CONSTANCE AUSTIN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2024-30979

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Sharon Bayus, individually and derivatively on behalf of Innovative Alternatives, Inc., filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s April 19, 2025 final judgment. On August 19, 2025, appellant filed a “Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal.” In her motion, appellant stated that she “desire[d] to dismiss the foregoing appeal.” Appellant therefore requested that the Court dismiss the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1) (permitting voluntary dismissal of appeal on motion of appellant).

No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Appellant’s motion includes a certificate of conference stating that appellees, Dennis Stetzel, Amber Cyr, Stacy Dickson, Sean Armistead, and Constance Austin, are unopposed to the relief requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2).

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion and dismisses the appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Gunn, and Dokupil.