Fabian Thomas v. Brysen Williams
Fabian Thomas v. Brysen Williams
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00444-CV ___________________________ FABIAN THOMAS, Appellant V. BRYSEN WILLIAMS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 481st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 24-10979-481
Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Fabian Thomas filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s August 20, 2025 order granting summary judgment for Appellee Brysen Williams and dismissing Thomas’s claims against him. The order does not state that it is final and appealable, and it does not dispose of Thomas’s claims against another defendant.
We notified Thomas of our concern that we might not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the order did not appear to be a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order. See CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011) (“Unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal, appellate courts generally only have jurisdiction over final judgments.”); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (listing appealable interlocutory orders); In re Elizondo, 544 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (discussing how appellate court may determine whether order or judgment is final). We notified Thomas that we could dismiss the appeal unless, by September 18, 2025, he or another party filed a response showing grounds for continuing it.
Thomas has not filed a response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam Delivered: October 16, 2025
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.