In Re Eric Springstun v. the State of Texas
In Re Eric Springstun v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-25-00377-CV __________________
IN RE ERIC SPRINGSTUN __________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding 457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25-09-15036 __________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Eric Springstun filed a petition for a writ of mandamus (and he filed a motion for temporary relief), seeking to compel the local administrative judge to rule on Springstun’s Chapter 11 vexatious litigant request for permission to file a notice of appeal in Trial Cause Number 25-09-15036. On October 13, 2025, Springstun notified this Court that his mandamus proceeding is moot because the local administrative judge signed an order granting him permission to appeal.1 We dismiss
The appeal has been docketed in the appellate court as Appeal Number 09- 25-00318-CV, Eric Springstun v. City of League City, Eric Cox, Donato Angelo De Pinto, and The Wharf at Clear Lake Maintenance Association, Inc. the mandamus proceeding and the motion for temporary relief without reference to the merits.
PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM Submitted on October 22, 2025 Opinion Delivered October 23, 2025 Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.