Oscar Molinar v. Mulholland Energy Services, LLC; Mulholland Employee Holdings, LLC; And Mulholland Services Holdco, Inc.

Opinion filed October 30, 2025

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-25-00067-CV __________ OSCAR MOLINAR, Appellant V. MULHOLLAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC; MULHOLLAND EMPLOYEE HOLDINGS, LLC; AND MULHOLLAND SERVICES HOLDCO, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 238th District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DCV-25-00102

MEMORANDUM OPINION This interlocutory appeal arises from the trial court’s order granting Appellees’ application for a temporary injunction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.

CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2024). Since September 22, Appellant has filed three “[a]greed” letters informing us that the parties have been negotiating and finalizing a settlement agreement in the case below. On October 24, Appellant informed us that the parties’ settlement agreement had been finalized and that, pursuant to Rule 162 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Appellees had filed a notice of nonsuit of their claims against Appellant with prejudice in the trial court.

See TEX. R. CIV. P. 162. In the same letter, Appellant notified us that his “interlocutory appeal is no longer necessary.”

We construe Appellant’s filing as an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, we grant his request and dismiss the appeal.

JOHN M. BAILEY CHIEF JUSTICE

October 30, 2025 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.