Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2025

Apolinar Rivera, Jr. v. the State of Texas

Apolinar Rivera, Jr. v. the State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 29, 2025

Apolinar Rivera, Jr. v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00470-CR Apolinar RIVERA, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-CR-10462A Honorable Joel Perez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Adrian A. Spears II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2025 DISMISSED Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Apolinar Rivera Jr. pled nolo contendere to aggravated robbery and was sentenced to thirty years of imprisonment in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On June 25, 2025, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Rivera filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk 04-25-00470-CR

sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d).

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal; or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See id. Thus, the trial court’s certification appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Rivera does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).

We informed Rivera that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that he had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended trial court certification has been filed. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.