Alexander Candelario, Individually and on Behalf of Practice Interactive, Inc. v. Bridget Mueller and Felipe Pereira Ribeiro
Alexander Candelario, Individually and on Behalf of Practice Interactive, Inc. v. Bridget Mueller and Felipe Pereira Ribeiro
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00839-CV
Alexander Candelario, Individually and on behalf of Practice Interactive, Inc., Appellant v. Bridget Mueller and Felipe Pereira Ribeiro, Appellees
FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-23-007678, THE HONORABLE MARIA CANTÚ HEXSEL, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant filed a “Notice of Mandamus Appeal” prompting the clerk’s office to file it as a notice of appeal. Because the order denying a motion for summary judgment appealed from is not a final or appealable judgment or order, this Court’s clerk asked the parties by letter whether this Court has jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal. Appellant replied that he intended only to file a petition for writ of mandamus, which he has in In re Candelario, No. 03-25-00863-CV. Appellant agrees that this Court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal in this cause.
We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); see generally Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014 (listing appealable interlocutory orders).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: November 25, 2025
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.