Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1900

Clark v. State

Clark v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided April 11, 1900 · Davidson
57 S.W. 847; 41 Tex. Crim. 635; 1900 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 59 (South Western Reporter)

Clark v. State

Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of theft, and his punishment assessed at ten days confinement in the county jail and a fine of $25. Motion is made by the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal because the recognizance fails to state the punishment as required by the statute. The recognizance states the punishment to be a fine of $25, omitting the ten days imprisonment in the ocunty jail. The statute requires that the punishment assessed by the jury shall he stated in the recognizance, and, as this has not been done, that instrument is fatally defective, and the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Dismissed.

Henderson, Judge, absent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.