Ritz v. State
Ritz v. State
95 S.W. 518; 49 Tex. Crim. 612; 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 172
(South Western Reporter)
Ritz v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted in the justice court for unlawfully carrying a pistol, and appealed to the county court where *613 he was again convicted and his punishment fixed at a fine of $25, and thence attempts to appeal to this court. Appeal will not lie in such case unless the amount of the fine exceeds $100. Therefore the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal is sustained, under the authority of Kruegel v. State, 12 Texas Ct. Rep., 234. Appeal dismissed.
Dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.