Hill v. State
Hill v. State
142 S.W. 1197; 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 694
(South Western Reporter)
Hill v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The motion for new trial alleges insufficiency of the evidence, and a general statement that the court erred in the charge. There are no specifications as to what errors were committed by the court in the charge. Without the statement of facts, these matters cannot be revised. The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.