Quentes v. State
Quentes v. State
151 S.W. 301; 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 713
(South Western Reporter)
Quentes v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant was convicted of burglary, and given the lowest penalty.
There is no bill of exception and no statement of facts. The only question raised is by a motion for new trial, to the effect that the verdict and judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence. Of course, this cannot be passed upon without a statement of facts.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.