Barth v. State
Barth v. State
156 S.W. 1199; 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 749
(South Western Reporter)
Barth v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of robbery, his punishment being assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions. There is nothing in the motion for new trial that can be considered and intelligently reviewed, in the absence of the statement of facts.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.