Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914

Pullum v. State

Pullum v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided June 24, 1914 · Peendeegast
168 S.W. 535; 74 Tex. Crim. 480; 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 354 (South Western Reporter)

Pullum v. State

Opinion of the Court

PEENDEEGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted for swindling.

There is no statement of facts. The indictment follows the statute and the approved forms, and properly charges the offense.

The sentence does not comply with the indeterminate sentence law. It should have done so. The cleric of this court will enter the proper order of sentence, and this judgment as reformed will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.