Pullum v. State
Pullum v. State
168 S.W. 535; 74 Tex. Crim. 480; 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 354
(South Western Reporter)
Pullum v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted for swindling.
There is no statement of facts. The indictment follows the statute and the approved forms, and properly charges the offense.
The sentence does not comply with the indeterminate sentence law. It should have done so. The cleric of this court will enter the proper order of sentence, and this judgment as reformed will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.