Messer v. State
Messer v. State
167 S.W. 342; 74 Tex. Crim. 96; 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 283
(South Western Reporter)
Messer v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law.
Court adjourned on 21st of February. The statement of facts and bills of exception were not filed until the 12th of March. The record does not contain an order authorizing the filing of the facts and the bills after the adjournment of the term. This being a misdemeanor, it was *97 necessary, and without the order allowing the twenty days after adjournment of the term these matters can not be considered. The record being in this condition, none of the matters set forth for revision can be considered.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.