Whitehead v. State
Whitehead v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted for unlawfully cutting timber on the land of another and fined $10.
What purports to be a statement of facts, and bills of exceptions were not filed until nearly ninety days after "the court, at which appellant was tried, adjourned. The State makes a motion to strike them out on that account, which is granted. Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, 155 S. W. Rep., 222; DeFriend v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 329, 153 S. W. Rep., 881; Stephens v. State, 158 S. W. Rep., 531-532; Wilson v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 547, 160 S. W. Rep., 454; Hampton v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 189, 161 S. W. Rep., 966; Newsome v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 453, 162 S. W. Rep., 891, and a great many other cases. There is no question raised which can he considered in the absence of a statement of facts.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.