Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914

Russell v. State

Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Decided June 10, 1914 · Dayidson
168 S.W. 95; 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 625 (South Western Reporter)

Russell v. State

Opinion of the Court

DAYIDSON, J.

[1] Appellant was convicted of misdemeanor theft. The statement of facts found in the record was not signed *96by the attorneys, nor approved by tbe court. Therefore it cannot be considered.

[2] There is a bill of exceptions in the record also; but this does not show to have been filed in the trial court, although approved by the judge. As these matters are presented, they cannot be considered .by the court, and in their absence the matters urged for reversal cannot be reviewed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.