Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to murder and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

*212 The only ground in the motion for a new trial claims that a new trial Should be granted “because the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence.” As no statement of the evidence heard on the trial accompanies the record before us, we can not review that ground.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.