Cranfill v. State
Cranfill v. State
189 S.W.2d 482; 80 Tex. Crim. 292; 189 S.W. 482; 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 330
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cranfill v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors without a license.
Court adjourned on the 29th day of July; the statement of' facts was filed on the 7th day of September. This was clearly beyond the time *293 authorized by law, towit: twenty days in which to file evidence in the County Court. There are quite a number of bills of exception. These were also filed on the 7th of September and can not be considered. Without these matters before the court there is nothing to revise, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.