Cutbirth v. State
Cutbirth v. State
183 S.W. 141; 79 Tex. Crim. 85; 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 70
(South Western Reporter)
Cutbirth v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant was convicted of perjury, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
This is a companion case to Beed v. State, this day decided, in an opinion by Judge Harper, cause No. 3938. The questions are, it may be stated, the same in both cases, except perhaps one question in the Beed case not in this case. Inasmuch as the Beed case has been affirmed it would serve no practical purpose to write an extended opinion in this case. Hpon the authority of that case the judgment herein will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.