Appellant was convicted of 'robbery and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the State penitentiary.

Ho statement of facts accompanies the record. Consequently, the only ground presented in the motion for a new trial we can consider is the one attacking the sufficiency of the indictment. The indictment charges robbery under our statute, and the court did not err in overruling the motion to quash it.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.