Vance v. State
Vance v. State
198 S.W. 146
(South Western Reporter)
Vance v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellants were convicted of burglary, and their punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary each.
The court gave a charge, and an additional charge. There were no exceptions reserved to the charges, or any other matter arising on the trial, and the evidence is not before us. So far as we are able to discover from the record, there is nothing requiring a reversal. In fact, the matters presented in the motion for new trial cannot be intelligently revised without the evidence.
The judgm’ent will thereafter be affirmed.
other cases see same topic and KEt-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.