Harris v. State
Harris v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a conviction for vagrancy, a common prostitute, wherein the fine was assessed at $25.
The term of court at which the conviction occurred adjourned on December 15th. The statement of facts and bills of exceptions were not filed until January 12th'following, eight days more than the twenty which could have been allowed for that purpose. There was no order allowing any time after adjournment, hence the State’s motion to strike out the bills and statement of facts must necessarily be granted. De Friend v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 329; Durham v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 71, and a great many other cases. Without these there is no question presented which can be.reviewed.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.