Upon his plea of • guilty appellant was convicted of the theft of an automobile of the value of $400. *162 There is no statement of facts or hill of exceptions. The charge and judgment of the court distinctly show that the appellant was properly admonished of the consequences of a plea of guilty by the court before the court would receive it. (Art. 565, 0. C. P.) Appellant merely filed a motion for a new trial, alleging that the judgment and verdict were contrary to the law and the evidence, hence there is nothing to review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.